Align application workflows with company responsibilities
Clarify who submits, reviews, and approves before configuring the process. We help adapt workflows to your operational requirements.
HR workflows can involve several people with different authority. Organisational changes or branch rules may require a review of the current setup. Flexible configuration can address many adjustments. Where an additional step is not supported, an enhancement can be discussed against the agreed process.
A delayed request is not always an application issue. Users may be unsure who should review it, or the setup may not reflect a recent change in responsibility. Agree duties before changing the workflow so configuration follows a shared understanding.
We map practical request examples, identifying the submitter, reviewer, approver, and expected outcome. These details guide the configuration review.
The standard workflow may cover most requests but leave important exceptions. Branches may have different approval authority, or another manager may act during an absence. Discuss examples before these situations interrupt a task.
We review available settings against company policy. Where a required step is not covered, an enhancement can be assessed. The aim is a process users can follow without unnecessary stages.
Check changes from both the requester’s and approver’s perspectives. Confirm that requests reach the right person and results are visible within the assigned permissions. Decide who will finish pending requests before the new workflow begins.
We guide relevant tests and explain changes to affected users. The company decides the effective date. Support remains available for questions and issues once the process is in use.
Set the effective date and treatment of already submitted requests when a manager or approval stage changes. Your company may decide to leave them with the previous reviewer or transfer them. A clear decision prevents requests waiting for someone no longer responsible.
Share the current workflow and the parts you want to improve. We review settings and enhancement needs with usability in mind. A clear workflow helps users know what to do next and reduces repeated coordination outside the application.
Sigma Solusi Informatika adjusts Sigma HRIS and Forte HRIS workflows according to confirmed company policies. During a system replacement, sample requests help verify the new process. Approval training for managers and ongoing support explain responsibilities after the change.
We review requirements against the available settings. An enhancement can be considered where an additional step is not covered.
Who submits, reviews, and approves; the expected result; and exceptions the process needs to handle.
No. Include the checks and authority the company actually needs so the process remains practical to use.
Share examples so we can assess the appropriate settings and any adjustment required.
Agree whether existing requests remain with the previous manager or move to the new manager. Decide before the change takes effect so each request retains a responsible approver.
We explain the agreed workflow and help with usage questions within the service scope.
Bring the current workflow, proposed responsibility changes, and pending request examples. We will discuss setup and checks before the new process enters use.